A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Onkar Nath Vs. Ved Vyas. East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949- Section 13(3)(a)(i) – A mere affidavit at a late stage of the litigative process can hardly be adequate to meet the mandate of Section 13(3) of the Act. AIR 1980 SC 1218: (1980) 4 SCC 270
Organo Chemical Industries and Another Vs Union of India and Others. Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952 – Sec. 14B – The Act a social security measure is a humane homage the State pays to Arts. 39 and 41 of the Constitution. The viability of the project depends on the employer duly deducting the worker’s contribution from their wages, adding his own little and promptly depositing the same. The mechanics of the system will suffer paralysis of the employer fails to perform his function. The dynamics of this beneficial statute derive its locomotive power from the funds regularly flowing into the statutory till-1980 (1) SCR 61.
Orient Power Cables Ltd vs Its Workmen – Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Sec. 17 and 18 – Dispute between the management and its workmen. Supreme Court settled the matter amicably. AIR 1978 SC 1281.